While we are (for good reasons) focusing on the SE aspects there are other useful things that are not appropriate for SE that we might want to consider as ‘secondary prioritizes’ i.e. useful things that would be nice later but are not what were focusing on at the moment.
These would be things that are closely related, and useful for the larger goals (good to link to) but as mentioned do not fit under the stack exchange format.
To me, three types of things this might include are:
Rolling conversations such as our current discussion section,
(other things that might go there are what are people using, how was the user/admin experience? type question.)
Lists
Listing options for a common class of applications (e.g. “all” the MPI implementations) or listing links (e.g. popular resources for learning bash, or translation tables for switching between schedulers).
’comprehensive’ write-ups on small topical domains
this might include quasi-newbie things like “general scheduler concepts”
or “what to consider and how to approach optimizing custom code for HPC/HTC use”